Losing your hard-earned money in a failed investment can be devastating. We know you work hard to earn extra money to put into savings and to invest for retirement. We understand the importance of financial security. We also know that high net worth investors often seek conservative investment strategies designed to preserve wealth. We realize the importance of safety of principal and understand appropriate exposure to risk.
You place trust in your broker (registered representative) and securities firm to recommend appropriate investments and to act in your best interests. You expect your financial advisor to give you honest, accurate information about your investment choices. Sometimes, however, your investments suffer losses because of misconduct by your investment advisor or others.
The news is full of stories about people who lost millions of dollars in investments that were misrepresented or inappropriate for their circumstances. If you have been the victim of securities fraud or broker misconduct, it may be possible to get back some or all of your money.
If you have lost money in a failed investment, you may have a claim to recover some or all of your losses.
As part of our representation, we will analyze and investigate your case. We will look into whether:
Universal Taxation Strategies has extensive experience in securities arbitrations, working to recover investment losses. In many securities fraud cases, our clients’ financial security, retirement savings or family wealth is at stake. We understand the importance of restoring your confidence and your losses. All of our clients receive the personalized attention of our partners and highly qualified advocates.
We have successfully represented thousands of individual investors in securities fraud lawsuits and arbitrations, with combined claims of hundreds of millions of dollars.
We handle securities arbitrations and litigation involving a variety of investment products and legal claims.
Although investment scams are evolving and scammers are always looking for new ways to prey upon unsuspecting investors, there are several common fraudulent schemes. Investors should be on the lookout for the following common investment scams.
Pump and Dump Schemes — consists of two phases:
This type of investment appears “too good to be true.” Unsolicited investments offered through direct mail, email, telephone or in person solicitations promising higher than market rates of return and limited risk are telltale signs of investment fraud. The purported high-yield investment may involve of an array ofinvestment products including stocks, bonds, mutual funds, commodities, annuities, real estate, private placements, municipal securities, complex ETFs, and others.
A Ponzi or Pyramid scheme is a type of fraudulent investment in which money collected from new investors is used to pay “returns” to earlier investors, creating a fiction that the initial investments are performing as promised. Without legitimate earnings to pay to investors, Ponzi scheme organizers must solicit new investments to continue the fraud. Investors are often sold on promises of high returns with minimal risks. When new investments dry up or a large number of investors attempt to liquidate their investments, the Ponzi scheme collapses.
The Internet can be a tremendous resource for all sorts of information, including information about investments and the people and companies promoting them. But, beware of what you read on the Internet: the Internet and social media sites also present vast opportunities for promoters of fraudulent investments.
These factors alone make the Internet a prime resource for scammers trying to get your money under the guise of an investment opportunity that may actually be a fraudulent scheme. Be particularly wary of online investment newsletters and offerings.
A “real estate investment trust” (“REIT”) may be a trust, corporation, or association that owns (and sometimes operates) real estate. Ownership in a REIT takes the form of transferable shares or “certificates of interest.” Owners expect to receive periodic distributions of income from the REIT. The shares in many REITs are publicly traded. REITs can also be privately held and sold through private placements. REITs provide a structure for investing in real estate similar to the structure mutual fundsprovide for investing in stocks. The value of an investment in a REIT will be heavily affected by the REIT’s underlying real estate assets and operating costs.
According to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), non-traded REITs pose additional risks not associated with traded REITs. Traded REITs are openly traded on national securities exchanges, which allow investors to buy or sell with relative ease. Non-traded REITs, on the other hand, are not listed on any national securities exchanges and pose liquidity problems. Despite a specified portion of shares being “redeemable” each year, the redemption price is usually below the current value. Non-traded REITs also typically charge investors higher fees, leaving fewer dollars for the actual investment. REIT distributions can also be suspended or stopped by the REIT’s board of directors. Early on, REITs are not likely to produce returns, and distributions are often paid out of investment capital. This means that distributions are not derived from income-producing property, but from cash reserves or new investors.
An ETF is an investment fund, similar to a mutual fund, but it can be traded on stock exchanges throughout the trading day at a fluctuating market price, much like stocks. (A standard, open-end mutual fund may be resold by the investor directly to the mutual-fund company only at a price determined by the fund’s net asset value at the day’s end.) ETF’s generally hold stocks, bond or commodities and often track an index. ETFs gained in popularity in the U.S. following the introduction of Standard & Poor’s Depositary Receipts (“SPDRs” or “Spiders”) in 1993, which were intended to track the results of the S&P 500 Index. The number and types of ETFs has grown, including ETFs that are highly complex and that invest in less traditional strategies.
Promissory notes are simply contracts under which an investor loans a specific sum of principal in exchange for the promise to receive interest over the term of the note, plus return of the principal at maturity. Payment of interest and repayment of principal depend on the borrower’s creditworthiness and the security and value of the collateral underlying the note, if any. While promissory notes may sound secure, they can be quite risky.
Variable annuities are an insurance product, a contract between you and an insurance company. They combine the features of an annuity (a guaranteed single or periodic payment from an insurance company) with the possibility of market gain (or loss) depending on the performance of an underlying investment strategy (the “variable” part of the investment), similar to a mutual fund. Thus, the insurance company guarantees a minimum payment and any remaining payments can vary depending upon the performance of the underlying investments. Common drawbacks to variable annuities include substantial penalties for early withdrawal, the potential for substantial fees and expenses, and the addition of credit risk (the risk that the insurance company might default on its contractual obligations to you) to the market risk of your chosen investment strategy.
In the U.S., shares trading for less than one dollar are known as microcap or penny stocks. Their low valuation and low trading volumes make them susceptible to price manipulation schemes. Penny stocks also lack transparency in their underlying business and operations and often do not have a verifiable financial history, making them susceptible to securities fraud schemes.
Options are one of the most common types of derivative investments available to individual investors. Derivative investments are contracts that derive their value from another, underlying investment (e.g., a stock, bond, or commodity). A stock option, for example, may give its holder the right (but not the obligation) to buy or sell shares of stock at a specified price. An option that gives the holder the right to buy something at a specified price at or before a future date is known as a “call.” An option that gives the holder the right to sell something at a specified price at or before a future date is known as a “put.” Many options are traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange (“CBOE”). Sometimes options are used for hedging (offsetting potential losses in another investment) or employee compensation (employee stock options). When used for speculation, options and other derivatives can present very high levels of risk.
Private placements are almost always sold under a “private placement memorandum” (“PPM”) describing the investment and its risk factors. A broker-dealer or advisor who sells non-public limited partnerships and other private placements is responsible for conducting reasonable due diligence to make sure that the PPM is complete and truthful.
Limited partnerships and limited liability companies are generally private companies (i.e., companies that are not traded on stock exchanges) in which investors can buy interests similar to shares of stock in a corporation. Oil and gas investments, real estate investments and private equity funds are often offered to investors through limited partnership interests. These investments are typically sold as “private placements” under a claimed exemption to the more stringent registration and disclosure obligations applicable to public offerings. To qualify for the most common exemptions, the offeror of limited partnership interests cannot make any general solicitation or advertisement to investors, and investors must (for the most part) be “accredited” investors meeting minimum requirements of income or net worth. The investment may be in the form of interests or units in a limited partnership or limited liability company.
Many private placements and limited partnerships are unregistered securities and/or may be sold only to accredited investors. Securities fraud may occur when a private placement is sold to an investor who does not qualify as an accredited investor. Private placements, limited partnerships and other unregistered securities carry additional risk because they are difficult to value and lack transparency in their operations and financial condition, making them susceptible to securities or investment fraudscams.
Mortgage Backed Securities (“MBS”) are debt obligations backed by pools of mortgage notes. Governmental or private entities purchase groups of mortgage notes and then combine them into pools. A “pool” typically consists of thousands of mortgage notes. The entity then offers investments in the pool by issuing “mortgage backed securities,” giving investors claims to the principal and interest payments made by the mortgagors of the notes in the pool.
The volatile nature of the underlying debt and lack of a secondary market make mortgage backed securities inherently complicated and risky. Collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and mortgage derivatives are additional, more complicated forms of mortgage backed securities.
Municipal Securities can offer welcomed diversity to an investor’s portfolio. “Muni Bonds” are often perceived to be less risky than the stock market, but that perception is not always accurate. In some instances, incomplete financials and disclosure issues can hinder investment advisors from providing suitable recommendations to investors. Investment advisors are required to obtain sufficient information about the City or County issuing the bond or other security to have a reasonable basis that the security is suitable for a particular investor. Having adequate information about a municipal issuer is key to avoiding securities fraud in an investment in municipal securities.
The sale of a life insurance policy before the death of the insured is a viatical. An investor who buys viatical purchases the right to receive all or a fractional portion of the death benefit from a life insurance policy insuring someone else’s life. These contracts are also known as “life settlement” contracts. The seller (policyholder/insured) receives a cash payment during his lifetime of less than the policy’s death benefit. The investor/buyer then receives the right to payment of the death benefit at the insured’s death.
Pitfalls inherent to viaticals/life settlement contracts include: the risk that the insured will live longer than expected (potentially increasing the amount of premiums that must be paid to keep the policy in force, and decreasing the rate of return); the risk that the death benefit will not be paid at all (because the policy has lapsed for nonpayment of premiums, the insurance company fails, or there was fraud in obtaining the policy); and the risk that the company or advisor selling the viaticals is operating a Ponzi or other fraudulent scheme.
Life Partners, Inc. (Life Partners) is a financial services company located in Waco, Texas that specializes in Life Settlement Contracts and Viaticals. According to numerous reports and governmental agencies, Life Partners may have improperly estimated the life expectancies of life insurance policyholders, thereby misrepresenting the value of Life Partners’ life settlement investments.
A life settlement contract is created when the seller, who is the original policyholder/insured typically at least 65 years of age, sells all or part of his or her life insurance policy for a lump sum payment before death. A “viatical” is a related product where the seller/insured (known in this case as the “viator”) has a terminal illness. The investor, who buys the life settlement contract or viatical, is buying the right to receive all or a portion of the policy’s death benefit. The purchase price takes into account the seller’s life expectancy, the death benefit and the policy’s remaining term.
Often, the buyer/investor must take on the payment of premiums to ensure the policy is kept in force until the insured’s death. Due to the nature of life settlement contracts and viaticals, investors are at risk for additional premiums and will experience a reduced rate of return if the insured person lives longer than expected. The longer the insured person or viator lives beyond his or her life expectancy and the more premiums the buyer pays to keep the policy active, the lower the return will be on the buyer’s investment. In some instances, the insured person or viator can outlive the term of the policy and, because there is no death benefit to distribute before the policy expires, the buyer will lose 100% of his or her investment. An investor in life settlement contracts or viaticals is essentially betting that the insured person will die before the expiration of the term life policy and within the projected life expectancy.
Companies such as Life Partners broker the purchase of viaticals or life settlement contracts between investors and policy owners, who want to receive cash during their lifetimes by selling the rights to the death benefits under their life insurance policies. In exchange for facilitating these transactions, Life Partners collects substantial fees regardless of whether the investors receive a return on their investment.
According to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, Life Partners acquired nearly 600 life settlement policies in fiscal year 2008 through 2010, with a collective face value of approximately $1.7 billion dollars.
The SEC filed suit against Life Partners Holding, Inc., Life Partners, Inc., R. Scott Peden (General Counsel and President), Brian Pardo (Chairman and CEO), and David Martin (CFO) in federal court in Waco, Texas, for misrepresenting the value of life insurance policies purchased on behalf of Life Partners’ customers. According to the SEC, Life Partners systematically and materially underestimated life expectancies in order to boost revenues and profit margins. Click here for the full SEC Litigation Release.
Texas State Securities BoardThe Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) issued a Press Release outlining Life Partners’ failure to answer several subpoenas of the TSSB. The TSSB has been conducting an ongoing investigation into Life Partners for suspected violations of the Texas Securities Act, including, but not limited to:
Due to Life Partners’ failure to cooperate, the TSSB was forced to file an Application to Enforce Subpoenas in the District Court of Travis County. In the Application, TSSB seeks a court order compelling Life Partners to disclose its records related to the marketing and sale of life settlement contracts. Named in the filing are Life Partners Holding, Inc., Life Partners, Inc., R. Scott Peden (General Counsel and President) and Brian Pardo (Chairman and CEO).
Colorado regulators also filed suit against Life Partners making similar accusations. According to theWall Street Journal, there was no finding of fraud, but the suit resulted in a settlement which required Life Partners to repurchase several policies sold to investors in Colorado.
If you invested in a Life Settlement Contract through Life Partners you may have a Claim.
The investment and securities fraud attorneys at Universal Taxation Strategies have extensive experience representing individual investors in claims involving life settlement contracts/viaticals.
In a recent case, Universal Taxation Strategies represented approximately 1000 individual investors who invested over $100 million in fraudulent viatical investments.
If you invested in a Viatical or Life Settlement Contract issued through Life Partners, you may have a claim. Call Universal Taxation Strategies today for a free consultation.
The attorneys at Universal Taxation Strategies have successfully represented thousands of individual investors in securities fraud claims and securities arbitration. These cases involve a variety of traditional and non-traditional investments. Non-traditional investments, such as limited partnerships, options trading, insurance products, collateralized mortgage obligations and derivatives, have grown in popularity in recent years and present additional dangers for investors.
We have represented investors from across the globe in securities arbitration and litigation for claims including:
Arbitration is a binding dispute-resolution process in which an impartial arbitrator or panel of arbitrators hear the evidence and decide how the dispute is resolved. An arbitration award is a final resolution and can be filed in court to have the same effect as a court judgment. Many brokerage firms require their clients to sign agreements stating that they will use arbitration, rather than take legal action, in the event of a disagreement. Stock, futures, or options exchanges and other professional or regulatory associations are often involved in administering arbitration proceedings.
Arbitrators are diverse people from many different walks of life. Their profiles detail their education, work history, experience, involvement with investment issues, and other relevant background and qualifications. If accepted, the potential arbitrators receive training, and their names and profiles go into a pool from which arbitrators are randomly selected for a given case., Some arbitrators work in the securities industry; others may be teachers, homemakers, investors, business people, medical professionals, or lawyers. Arbitrators should be fair and impartial.
Arbitrators can also be removed from a case to avoid a conflict of interest.
The investment and securities fraud attorneys at Universal Taxation Strategies have extensive experience representing individual investors in securities arbitration and litigation. Universal Taxation Strategies have successfully represented thousands of clients in securities and investment fraud cases, with combined claims of hundreds of millions of dollars.
If you have suffered an investment loss, you may be entitled to recover all or part of your investment. To find out more about your potential claims against your broker/financial advisor, investment firm, or securities firm, please contact an experienced investment fraud attorney.